[187193] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Thu Jan 21 23:28:02 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <0C8CBFCB-E596-44BE-A31C-CAE0FB98652F@ipifony.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:27:57 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Matthew D. Hardeman" <mhardeman@ipifony.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman
<mhardeman@ipifony.com> wrote:
> An excellent point. Nobody would tolerate this in IPv4 land. Those disp=
utes tended to end in days and weeks (sometimes months), but not years.
>
> That said, as IPv6 is finally gaining traction, I suspect we=E2=80=99ll b=
e seeing less tolerance for this behavior.
pop your popcorn...
