[187059] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: de-peering for security sake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Sun Jan 17 16:06:09 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:06:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net>
To: bzs@theworld.com
In-Reply-To: <22171.64818.450203.735607@pcls8.std.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, bzs@theworld.com wrote:
> Sure, you have your hands on BGP etc, so what router commands (hammer)
> can effect international policy (nail)?
>
> This is fundamentally a social and political issue and needs to be
> dealt with on that level, not with changes in router configs.
bgp blackhole fed by rbl?
at the very least, scavenger queue packets by rbl.
complacency / willful negligence needs to have a monetary cost.
-Dan
