[186831] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Jan 5 20:12:58 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACumZjyzpN532OO=B2sd4FUivuigo49RApZUOcsY=wUc3ZqMyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:10:41 -0800
To: Mansoor Nathani <mnathani.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Yes and no=E2=80=A6
Yes, IBM bot Softlayer.
No, IBM datacenters that predate Softlayer still can=E2=80=99t spell =
IPv6.
Softlayer datacenters all had IPv6 before IBM got to them.
Owen
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 14:53 , Mansoor Nathani <mnathani.lists@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Aren't IBM and Softlayer one and the same these days?
>=20
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com =
<mailto:owen@delong.com>> wrote:
> I bet if more people moved to clouds that have IPv6 support such as:
>=20
> Host Virtual vr.org <http://vr.org/> <http://vr.org/ =
<http://vr.org/>>
> Softlayer softlayer.com <http://softlayer.com/> =
<http://softlayer.com/ <http://softlayer.com/>>
> Linode linode.com <http://linode.com/> =
<http://linode.com/ <http://linode.com/>>
>=20
> Places like Amazon and Google and IBM would get the message faster =
than
> from people complaining on this list.
>=20
> Owen
>=20
> > On Jan 5, 2016, at 08:15 , James Hartig <fastest963@gmail.com =
<mailto:fastest963@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I would hope that Google would first fix the fact that "Compute =
Engine
> > networks do not support IPv6 at all."[1] before doing anything with =
SEO.
> >
> > [1] https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/networking =
<https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/networking>
> > --
> > James Hartig
>=20
>=20
