[186834] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mansoor Nathani)
Tue Jan 5 23:02:05 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <9A16AAB2-F8C8-4C3E-AFC8-9FFD8CC13A7C@delong.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:53:56 -0500
From: Mansoor Nathani <mnathani.lists@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Aren't IBM and Softlayer one and the same these days?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> I bet if more people moved to clouds that have IPv6 support such as:
>
> Host Virtual vr.org <http://vr.org/>
> Softlayer softlayer.com <http://softlayer.com/>
> Linode linode.com <http://linode.com/>
>
> Places like Amazon and Google and IBM would get the message faster than
> from people complaining on this list.
>
> Owen
>
> > On Jan 5, 2016, at 08:15 , James Hartig <fastest963@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would hope that Google would first fix the fact that "Compute Engine
> > networks do not support IPv6 at all."[1] before doing anything with SEO.
> >
> > [1] https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/networking
> > --
> > James Hartig
>
>
