[186806] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Jan 4 19:28:57 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABSP1Odp_LV578xcg6ppDU8vNL-8T4MhRbE0hbsG4yebYH4hfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:27:46 -0800
To: Damian Menscher <damian@google.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 16:21 , Damian Menscher <damian@google.com> wrote:
>=20
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com =
<mailto:owen@delong.com>> wrote:
> domain.name <http://domain.name/> results are 82 (16.4%) up from 69 =
(13.8%).
> www.domain.name <http://www.domain.name/> <http://www.domain.name/ =
<http://www.domain.name/>> results are 101 (20.2%) up from 81 (16.2%)
>=20
> As a professional pessimist, I can't help but note that of the 111 =
sites responding over IPv6 (I'm including a 400 or 500 as a "response"), =
more than half (58) are operated by Google. So ignoring Google sites, =
the Alexa Top 500 becomes the Alexa Top 441 and has 53 IPv6-enabled =
sites, or ~12%.
>=20
> Damian
I think 12% vs. 16% isn=E2=80=99t that much of a difference. Both =
numbers are horribly horribly low.
Owen
