[186798] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Jan 4 17:23:23 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <101658.1451945370@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:23:20 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq?hl=en
there I asked jeeves for ya!
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:09 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:52:46 -0800, Damian Menscher said:
>
>> While I agree with your general sentiment about 3xx responses (often used
>> to redirect example.com to www.example.com) I think your concerns about
>> 8.8.8.8 are over-stated. 8.8.8.8 is deployed in many locations, which
>> gives DNS-based geolocation a decent chance of working.
>
> So in how many of the 196 or so extant countries does 8.8.8.8 resolve to
> a host which, when it sends a query up the chain, appears to be in the
> same country as the machine that made the original query?
>
> How does a company know that another instance of 8.8.8.8 has been turned up or
> down or re-peered, causing a shift in the mapping of DNS queries to countries/
> states?
>
>
