[186794] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Jan 4 16:24:49 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <201C563E-5546-434A-B806-83C91184CC24@delong.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:21:56 -0500
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1451942516_81471P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:59:40 -0800, Owen DeLong said:
> These numbers might be slightly pessimistic because 3XX series responses are
> not counted as good.
They may be a *lot* more than slightly pessimistic - consider the case of
any site that uses 3xx replies to redirect to a geo-IP based server rather
than doing it in DNS (which has the problem that you're redirecting based
on the IP of the DNS server that asked, which will fail miserably for
anybody using 8.8.8.8 as their DNS server)
--==_Exmh_1451942516_81471P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=fEmE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1451942516_81471P--
