[186400] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Wed Dec 16 11:22:34 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Ahmed Munaf <ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net>, Hunter Fuller <hf0002+nanog@uah.edu>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:22:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <5D7E4B7E-3672-41E1-8BF6-F1D6C85CFDE1@hrins.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 16/Dec/15 12:45, Ahmed Munaf wrote:
> Yes, we are using ASR1004 for NAT, we are considering A10 or Citrix or F5. we’ve not decided till now!
> maybe we change it to another product, if anyone give us a better solution.
>
> this will be used for ISP’s users.
The ASR1000 is not a bad large scale NAT device. Are there any specific
issues you are facing with it?
Mark.
