[186396] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ahmed Munaf)
Wed Dec 16 05:45:23 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Ahmed Munaf <ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAMFTxdS7O48YY3jW+TxNF7TS7T3h1r6FvLfo+mCHty99oOfhsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:45:16 +0300
To: Hunter Fuller <hf0002+nanog@uah.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Yes, we are using ASR1004 for NAT, we are considering A10 or Citrix or =
F5. we=E2=80=99ve not decided till now!=20
maybe we change it to another product, if anyone give us a better =
solution.=20
this will be used for ISP=E2=80=99s users.=20
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 4:15 AM, Hunter Fuller <hf0002+nanog@uah.edu> =
wrote:
>=20
> You are using a Cisco what for NAT? And which products are you =
considering?
>=20
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2015, Ahmed Munaf <ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net =
<mailto:ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net>> wrote:
> Dear All,
>=20
> We are using cisco for natting, we'd like to change it to another =
brand like A10 or Citrix.
>=20
> Please any advice regarding the three brands and what are the =
advantages and disadvantages for each one?
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
>=20
>=20
