[186310] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ashwin Jacob Mathew)
Wed Dec 9 13:29:03 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Ashwin Jacob Mathew <ashwin@pch.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:23:57 -0800
In-Reply-To: <F64B1357-DC79-46F9-BD48-7A3D1B96B381@pch.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
PCH maintains routing archives here:
https://www.pch.net/resources/Raw_Routing_Data/
In aggregate, our AS3856 collects routes from 1307 distinct ASNs spread
across 82 IXPs.
> *From:* Kurt Kraut via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
> *Date:* December 8, 2015 at 08:24:31 PST
> *To:* NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
> *Subject:* *Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?*
> *Reply-To:* Kurt Kraut <listas@kurtkraut.net
> <mailto:listas@kurtkraut.net>>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
> Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
> in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response
> from them since July.
>
> Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used
> resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives.
>
> Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the
> point of view of my routers have of the internet?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Kurt Kraut
