[186299] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Kemp)
Tue Dec 8 14:37:18 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: John Kemp <kemp@network-services.uoregon.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:37:13 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAPbn28kU479kC6NT5=QDZ_FLLRx4F_abjCUfegFx0ea1gvhnXg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: kemp@network-services.uoregon.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
The problem being discussed here relates to:
route-views.saopaulo.routeviews.org
We do have a lot of outstanding requests for that collector.
But there are some issues there that we need to discuss with
the exchange. We'll work on getting that moving forward.
Apologies for the lack of response.
John Kemp
help@routeviews.org
On 12/8/15 8:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
> Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
> in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response
> from them since July.
>
> Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used
> resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives.
>
> Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the
> point of view of my routers have of the internet?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Kurt Kraut
>
