[186296] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Tue Dec 8 12:02:00 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Kurt Kraut via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>,
John Kemp <kemp@network-services.uoregon.edu>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:01:57 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAPbn28kU479kC6NT5=QDZ_FLLRx4F_abjCUfegFx0ea1gvhnXg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--TkqjTAn2kIGDbAtu5B9NGHF0TwTAUSpqw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I'm still on the help@routeviews.org alias.
I haven't seen any mail from Kurt Kraut.
so I would suspect that something is being filtered someplace.
perhaps we can interceed to identify that issue.
thanks
joel
On 12/8/15 8:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
>=20
> For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomou=
s
> Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other=
AS
> in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a respon=
se
> from them since July.
>=20
> Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most use=
d
> resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives.
>=20
> Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing th=
e
> point of view of my routers have of the internet?
>=20
>=20
> Best regards,
>=20
>=20
> Kurt Kraut
>=20
--TkqjTAn2kIGDbAtu5B9NGHF0TwTAUSpqw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAlZnDQcACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrKpyQCeJjDmAy6exgBWg2pdsWz0FF2X
eJ8AnRE6VY8ZHa+ATh55g9SvmvivnQU7
=qEeA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--TkqjTAn2kIGDbAtu5B9NGHF0TwTAUSpqw--
