[186273] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGF Mandate Renewl
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Dec 7 14:12:03 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <634D9AB2-94B4-4CFD-A06C-BCAD3ADC5E86@delong.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 14:08:34 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
but the ITU is a larger conference over more time, so that's a plus, right?
also, it's international, and telephone, so really .. .they are super
qualified to talk about internet governance stuff.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> The IGF is certainly preferable to moving this role into the ITU.
>
> Owen
>
>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 07:37 , Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com> w=
rote:
>>
>> The UN's Internet Governance Forum is up for renewal at the end of 2015,=
without UN approval they will be shutdown. I am relatively new here and ha=
ven't seen much discussion about IGF and UN (attempted) involvement in the =
internet. How do people feel about the IGF and should it be renewed by the =
UN? I can't really figure out what gap they fill other than being big confe=
rence.
>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Governance_Forum#2015_mandate_ren=
ewal
>>
>>
>
