[186271] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGF Mandate Renewl
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Dec 7 13:53:44 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR07MB22003758766B65A03D321E83FA090@CY1PR07MB2200.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:52:27 -0800
To: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
The IGF is certainly preferable to moving this role into the ITU.
Owen
> On Dec 7, 2015, at 07:37 , Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> The UN's Internet Governance Forum is up for renewal at the end of =
2015, without UN approval they will be shutdown. I am relatively new =
here and haven't seen much discussion about IGF and UN (attempted) =
involvement in the internet. How do people feel about the IGF and should =
it be renewed by the UN? I can't really figure out what gap they fill =
other than being big conference.
>=20
>=20
> =
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Governance_Forum#2015_mandate_renew=
al
>=20
>=20
