[185539] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Uptick in spam
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk)
Tue Oct 27 06:46:23 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:37:59 +0000
From: A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk
To: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALA5tJJS5jfDNZZcUGwykKzFPwLQyejeOVC5oLZGUXt_GxRrCw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hi,
> not even close to more discussing than from the original spam. Not even
> close.
data volume wise, the discussion of spam is easily beating the volume of spam
(which some people had issue with) as the SPAM emails were very small with just a
URL - the discusions about it is now spread into around 6 threads with many pages of text
in some messages.
alan