[185528] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Uptick in spam
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Kirch)
Mon Oct 26 23:27:02 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR07MB220030CEAAC32E266AC9B9D6FA230@CY1PR07MB2200.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:26:58 -0400
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
To: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
not even close to more discussing than from the original spam. Not even
close.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com>
wrote:
> I think there might be more emails discussing the spam, than the actual
> spam itself.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ian Smith
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:34 PM
> To: Paras <paras@protrafsolutions.com>
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Uptick in spam
>
> Filtering *@jdlabs.fr did the trick for me.
>
> Of course, now I have to write a much more complex filter to hide all the
> complaining about NANOG spam :)
>
> Ian Smith
> ________________________________________
>
> 161 South St. Hightstown, NJ
> 201-315-1316 phone
> ian.w.smith@gmail.com
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Paras <paras@protrafsolutions.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I see it too, there are some 517 messages in my spam folder "New message"
> >
> > Most of them get blocked, but a small fraction are still making it
> > into my inbox
> >
> >
> > On 10/25/2015 12:13 AM, anthony kasza wrote:
> >
> >> Has there been a recent uptick in crap sent to the list or is it just
> me?
> >> Is there anything that we can do to filter these messages with junk
> links?
> >>
> >> -AK
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
