|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org To: nanog@nanog.org From: Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon@cox.net> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:21:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <562D5E24.1010704@2mbit.com> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On 10/25/2015 17:56, Brielle Bruns wrote: > This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with > mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal > with this? You can find people who have been convinced that NANOG is fundamentally pro-abuse because to many of them, it is revenue traffic. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |