|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> From: Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:46:54 -0600 In-Reply-To: <2764030732961784535@unknownmsgid> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On 10/26/15 11:24 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > On Oct 26, 2015, at 13:10, Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> wrote: > >> This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this? > > > I asked a similar question myself on another list. > > But then after a minute's reflection, the fact that we all got 200+ > messages like this on the NANOG list and not a single other message > complaining about it suggests that someone did actually hit the big > red moderation button promptly, and just waited until Monday to sort > it out (which would not have been completely unreasonable, I think). > > The residual messages that tricked through after that seem likely to > be nothing more than outbound queues draining. > > > Joe > I considered the same thing as you, initially. Went back and looked at the raw headers though, and the early Received headers - shows the messages were still coming in over the course of the weekend rather then just say Friday night and then it was a queue purge. My filters kicked in on Sat evening once I added something to counteract the whitelist for nanog's mails (going through nanog servers), so I'm missing alot of the later spew from Sunday. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |