[184671] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Wed Oct 14 14:22:54 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:21:10 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <A701200B-6814-49B9-923F-3EF14EB016F5@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Some people here just strive to be dicks...
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Herbert" <george.herbert@gmail.com>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>, "Rich Kulawiec" <rsk@gsp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 1:19:00 PM
Subject: Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
You guys aren't devious enough.
These guys are in violation of CAN-SPAM. To the tune of exceeding the statutory maximum $1,000,000 per ISP last *month* for some of you, much less in the statute of limitations period. You could probably point to refusal to remove as justifying the triple damages claim.
Everyone on this list just earned your companies $3 million.
Call your attorneys.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.procmail.org/
>> I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach. There is no
>> obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet
>> services to them, including SMTP services.
>
> computers are cheap. my time is finite and i value it highly. what is
> the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time?
>
> randy
