[184670] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Herbert)
Wed Oct 14 14:19:00 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2pp0hproo.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:19:00 -0700
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>,
Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
You guys aren't devious enough.
These guys are in violation of CAN-SPAM. To the tune of exceeding the statu=
tory maximum $1,000,000 per ISP last *month* for some of you, much less in t=
he statute of limitations period. You could probably point to refusal to re=
move as justifying the triple damages claim.
Everyone on this list just earned your companies $3 million.
Call your attorneys.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.procmail.org/
>> I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach. There is no
>> obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet
>> services to them, including SMTP services.
>=20
> computers are cheap. my time is finite and i value it highly. what is
> the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time?
>=20
> randy
