[184637] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Irony.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Max Tulyev)
Tue Oct 13 05:58:56 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:56:51 +0300
From: Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTceKzV13GKUWdQa-spXoCrTvB+hds9AzvvP4GCqmEySA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in hardware.
Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on...
So upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient for IPv6
adoption ;)
On 13.10.15 06:17, Ca By wrote:
> On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher <D.Lasher@f5.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6
>> has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support today
>> Ironic.
>>
>> Oh wait..
>>
>> Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself.
>>
>> Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters of
>> IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. And
>> being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. A
>> static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted.
>>
>> :sigh:
>>
>>
>>
> Tech support websites are long tail
>
> Pragmatists are focused on getting ipv6 to the masses by default in
> high traffic use cases.
>
> Sighing about edge cases in the long tail with ipv6 ... Not sure what you
> expect.
>
> <deleted comments about f5 not supporting standard ndp, which has caused me
> outtages>
>
> CB
>
