[184339] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sven-Haegar Koch)
Fri Oct 2 06:54:00 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:53:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@sdinet.de>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151002070153.0EE3C39246F0@rock.dv.isc.org>
Cc: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Likewise, sub-allocations can come into play, where a hoster is
> > delegated a /48, but then subdivides it for various customers.
>
> A hoster is a LIR. It isn't the end customer.
I think you are wrong here for a lot of szenarios.
Today we have for example small web-agency gets /25 from datacenter
hoster (LIR), puts two servers there, couple of VM, and then rents those
VM to its 50 customers.
From the datacenter hoster point they would perhaps get one /48...
c'ya
sven-haegar
--
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.
- Ben F.
