[184335] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Oct 2 03:47:19 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Rob McEwen <rob@invaluement.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <560E1F7C.6030808@invaluement.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 03:44:31 -0400
Cc: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1443771871_2266P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 02:09:00 -0400, Rob McEwen said:
> Likewise, sub-allocations can come into play, where a hoster is
> delegated a /48, but then subdivides it for various customers.
So they apply for a /32 and give each customer a /48.
A hoster getting *just* a /48 is about as silly as a hoster
getting a /32 of IPv4 and NAT'ing their customers.
--==_Exmh_1443771871_2266P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=ijcN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1443771871_2266P--
