[184309] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Thu Oct 1 20:55:10 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:55:19 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGSQmBWOjN7oFYt9cMyGM0PNz10PTCGAH1NoR1qLtrVA=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 10/1/2015 5:16 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
> I run a large 464xlat dominated mobile network.
>
> IPv4 bits are materially more expensive to deliver.
Isn't that simply a consequence of your engineering decision to use
464xlat instead of native dual-stack, as was originally envisioned for
the transition?
>
> And, as FB has shared, IPv6 is more performant for end users, and more
> performant is more profitable
>
Isn't that also at least partially a consequence of your engineering
decision to use 464xlat?
Matthew Kaufman
