[183563] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Moore)
Tue Sep 8 19:59:36 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Josh Moore <jmoore@atcnetworks.net>
To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:12:55 +0000
In-Reply-To: <23313.1441739306@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We are talking a purely bridged environment. However, I have been wondering=
how in the world end-to-end IPv6 connectivity is supposed to work if a cus=
tomer hooks up their own router. That is one of the points of IPv6...
Joshua Moore
Network Engineer
ATC Broadband
912.632.3161 - O | 912.218.3720 - M
-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]=20
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:08 PM
To: Josh Moore
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:04:06 -0000, Josh Moore said:
> I'm reading that the recommended method for assigning IPv6 addresses to e=
nd-users is to do this via a dedicated VLAN and /64.
Important question - are you talking about the IPv6 address supplied to the=
CPE router itself, or a /48 or /56 delegated to the CPE router to allocate=
to subnets and devices behind it?
