[183608] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Clinton Work)
Wed Sep 9 14:51:40 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Clinton Work <clinton@scripty.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <7B11BBC4-8B7B-49FD-B03C-0ACFCAB10263@delong.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:51:33 -0600
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Granted that having the CPE request both a IA_NA and IA_PD is a more
common configuration. Some of the CPEs using only DHCPv6 PD can
allocate a /64 out of the delegated /48 for WAN address & management.
The IPV6 traceroute is not broken with the DHCPv6 PD only configuration.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Sure, but this is a useless savings that comes at the cost of awkward
> traceroute output
> that will initially confuse your new employees and consistently confuse
> your customers.
