[183561] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Sep 8 19:54:36 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Josh Moore <jmoore@atcnetworks.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR07MB02781CE2D38DC9B8856AAD1C0530@BY2PR07MB027.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:08:26 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1441739306_3480P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:04:06 -0000, Josh Moore said:
> I'm reading that the recommended method for assigning IPv6 addresses to end-users is to do this via a dedicated VLAN and /64.
Important question - are you talking about the IPv6 address supplied to
the CPE router itself, or a /48 or /56 delegated to the CPE router to
allocate to subnets and devices behind it?
--==_Exmh_1441739306_3480P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=3Y8d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1441739306_3480P--
