[183552] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rich Kulawiec)
Tue Sep 8 04:31:38 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 04:31:33 -0400
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <b2f8651971045e32b762cbc47db42d3f@ruggedinbox.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 09:14:02PM +0000, Connor Wilkins wrote:
> Honestly.. the best method is to not let it bug you anymore. It's
> only a seething issue to you because you let it be.

Curiously enough, the same thing was said about spam 30-ish years ago.
The "ignore it and maybe it will go away" approach did not yield
satisfactory results.

These "disclaimers" are stupid and abusive.  They have no place in
*any* email traffic, and most certainly not in a professional forum.
And it is unreasonable to expect the recipients of the demands and
threats they embody to silently tolerate them ad infinitum.

---rsk

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post