[183551] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Software Defined Networking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Mon Sep 7 17:18:09 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 16:17:01 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <55EDFE3E.6050509@foobar.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I thought it was purely for vendors to sell you more crap?=20
-----=20
Mike Hammett=20
Intelligent Computing Solutions=20
http://www.ics-il.com=20
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Hilliard" <nick@foobar.org>=20
To: nanog@nanog.org=20
Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 4:14:38 PM=20
Subject: Re: Software Defined Networking=20
On 07/09/2015 21:23, James Downs wrote:=20
> What do you mean when you say =E2=80=9Csoftware defined networking=E2=80=
=9D? Do you have=20
> a particular problem or use case you are approaching?=20
since when was that a requirement for SDN?=20
Nick=20