[183527] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Software Defined Networking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Sat Sep 5 13:35:15 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKmZDFC+7gZLZ=boEDWBAK9WjnZzSSAeRfbS-TuP+5ZBC4bxFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 13:35:30 -0400
To: Tyler Mills <me@tylermills.net>
Cc: "Aaron C. de Bruyn" <aaron@heyaaron.com>,
NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
These disclaimers have been proven to be added by the paranoid.
eg:
=
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-08-26/business/ct-biz-0826-chicago=
-law-20110826_1_disclaimers-legal-obligations-binding
Basically, unless you already have an existing written NDA you=E2=80=99re =
likely not bound. Your company may have an NDA between yourself and a =
vendor, carrier or otherwise. If you=E2=80=99re not sure, ask.
- Jared
> On Sep 4, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Tyler Mills <me@tylermills.net> wrote:
>=20
> Would be hard to prove that you implicitly agreed to the constraints
> mentioned within the email by just merely receiving it and reading it.
> Even EULA's require you to check a box or click "I Accept."
>=20
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, 2:30 PM Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon@cox.net> =
wrote:
>=20
>> On 9/4/2015 12:57, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
>>> I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to:
>>>=20
>>> 220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal
>>> disclaimers are null and void.
>>> 220 You also agree that I am awesome.
>>=20
>> I like that. Unfortunately, I no longer operate a mail host.
>>=20
>> I have been trying to figure out how to mechanically route messages
>> containing them to the spam sump.
>>=20
>> IANAL, but I thing an interesting case would be trying to enforce =
that
>> crap in a situation involving unsolicited email (as in this case).
>>=20
>> --
>> sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
>>=20
