[183512] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Software Defined Networking

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (alvin nanog)
Fri Sep 4 19:15:27 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:15:21 -0700
From: alvin nanog <nanogml@Mail.DDoS-Mitigator.net>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <93965.1441407576@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


hi valdis

On 09/04/15 at 06:59pm, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> 
> Does anybody have a citation that legal disclaimers attached to
> publicly posted mail aren't null and void?  Seems to me that
> what they're trying to say is "Sorry, we're too lame to use
> PGP or similar on actually sensitive e-mail"...

i keep wondering why "they" keep using sniffable clear text 
smtp/imap/pop3 instead of at least encrypted version

the problem also is both ends, the sender and the receiver
and all the laptops/desktops need to be configured

more importantly, why not just use https based webmail
or even smpts encrypted google mail where less setup and
configuring would be needed for sender and receiver

have a nice weekend
alvin
#
# DDoS-Mitigator.com
#


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post