[183316] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Production-scale NAT64
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Aug 27 01:33:03 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:32:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20150827051657.4F33B36446DF@rock.dv.isc.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 27/Aug/15 07:16, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Or why you are looking at NAT64 instead of DS-Lite, MAP-E, or MAP-T
> all of which are better solutions than NAT64. NAT64 + DNS64 which
> breaks DNSSEC.
Because with NAT64/DNS64/464XLAT, there isn't any "undo work" after the
dust settles.
There is value in that.
Mark.
