[183329] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Production-scale NAT64
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Aug 27 12:24:00 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:23:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.02.1508271154360.1024@brugal>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 27/Aug/15 17:57, Brandon Ross wrote:
>
>
> I strongly advise you to not assume that just because an IPv4 address
> is "public" (which I'm reading as RFC1918) means that it's not NATed.
>
> I learned the hard way that Tmobile, for one, squats on other
> organization's public IP space on their mobile network and NATs it to
> address space they are actually assigned. What you really mean is if
> your IPv4 is not NATed, then it should not "feel slow", the type of
> address isn't necessarily an indicator.
If we're being pedantic, yes.
Mark.
