[183294] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Production-scale NAT64
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Aug 26 11:18:22 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTGeQpi9udS8Bf1AVnF9SPw25fH=De1R25M6AoBN_TXtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:16:11 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1440602171_2312P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said:
> Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic
> require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6
> (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo, Linkedin and so on ...).
So I'm guessing that 75% of the traffic flows with better latency than
the 25% IPvhorse-n-buggy traffic? ;)
--==_Exmh_1440602171_2312P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=ArtX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1440602171_2312P--
