[183292] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Production-scale NAT64
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Wed Aug 26 10:36:20 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:35:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTGeQpi9udS8Bf1AVnF9SPw25fH=De1R25M6AoBN_TXtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 26/Aug/15 16:28, Ca By wrote:
>
>
> From largish deployment ...
>
> Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers
> traffic require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through
> end-to-end IPv6 (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo,
> Linkedin and so on ...).
And trust me, Cameron knows what's on about...
And just in case it's not obvious, fewer and fewer bits will need to hit
the NAT64 gateways as more and more of the Internet turns up IPv6.
And the beauty of it all, NAT64-based service providers don't have to
decommission anything in the future; this is one of the key points
around using NAT64 as transition tech.
Mark.
