[183289] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Production-scale NAT64
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Wed Aug 26 10:19:53 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:19:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20150826T141310Z@localhost>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 26/Aug/15 16:13, Izaac wrote:
> Yes, I'm curious about this too. I'd like a solid list of providers to
> avoid.
NAT64 is opt-in.
It will mostly be used for customers that can no longer obtain IPv4
addresses.
Service providers do not like NAT64 anymore than you do, but there needs
to be some way to bridge both protocols in the interim.
What you should be more interested in is which service providers have
deployed it at scale where it is not causing problems, as those are the
ones you want to be connected to when the IPv4-hell hiteth the faneth!
Mark.
