[183175] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A multi-tenant firewall for an MSSP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colin Johnston)
Mon Aug 17 04:17:25 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <c6af218bb1314f92cc86fcfb8a7cbd42@jonesy.com.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:17:20 +0100
To: Andrew Jones <aj@jonesy.com.au>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
one vm per sophos utm per customer
works well even with low ram as well
Colin
> On 17 Aug 2015, at 08:14, Andrew Jones <aj@jonesy.com.au> wrote:
>=20
> Is there a multi-tennant capable UTM from Sophos? Or are you using a =
vm instance per customer?
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>=20
> On 17.08.2015 16:47, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> sophos utm works great :)
>>=20
>> Colin
>>=20
>>> On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56, Rakesh M <raaki.88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> I have seen one of our customers using Sophos and they are =
relatively happy
>>> about it. Not directly experienced though.
>>>=20
>>> Thanks
>>> Rakesh
>>>=20
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish =
<ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>=20
>>>> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start =
providing
>>>> security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had =
experience on
>>>> this, and if there are any recommendations for the UTM's vendor.
>>>>=20
>>>> People/customers here are more familiar with the Fortigate, =
however, we
>>>> need to build a well-rounded solution that suits wide range of =
enterprises'
>>>> business needs.
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>=20
>>>> Ramy
>>>>=20
>=20
