[183174] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A multi-tenant firewall for an MSSP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ramy Hashish)
Mon Aug 17 03:32:10 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <6E922826-DB47-4735-8099-D6D3037EA469@gt86car.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:29:47 +0300
From: Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
To: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thank you Rakesh and Colin.
I just want to amend something, "FW as a service" rather than "security as
a service".
Are you sure sophos has such a solution?
Thanks,
Ramy
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
wrote:
> sophos utm works great :)
>
> Colin
>
> > On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56, Rakesh M <raaki.88@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have seen one of our customers using Sophos and they are relatively
> happy
> > about it. Not directly experienced though.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Rakesh
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start providing
> >> security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had experience on
> >> this, and if there are any recommendations for the UTM's vendor.
> >>
> >> People/customers here are more familiar with the Fortigate, however, we
> >> need to build a well-rounded solution that suits wide range of
> enterprises'
> >> business needs.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Ramy
> >>
>
>
