[183025] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Mon Aug 10 21:28:31 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:28:18 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4695.1439255263@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 8/10/2015 6:07 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:36:07 +1000, Nick Pratley said:
>
>> Once setup correctly. very good product - it's been running for 8
>> months now and hasn't had any issues. It's been very reliable.
>
> I'll bite - (roughly) how many times has it triggered and mitigated
> an actual DDoS during those 8 months? We probably draw different
> conclusions from "8 months and 1 DDoS" reliable and "8 months of
> 5-a-week" reliable...
>
I think that would definitely depend on how the network is base-lined.
That is sometimes more of an art than a science. :-)
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iF4EAREIAAYFAlXJT7EACgkQKJasdVTchbJXoQD+Mhyy7gwtMkp+mdaEUiqvwlWe
70mSH8n5ALmcp+qOqMoBAKo60u/ryb9IdvsclzPpoAvq+r9CtZgh+t/9YpkUIgnP
=d7d1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
