[183023] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Aug 10 21:07:53 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Nick Pratley <nick.pratley@serversaustralia.com.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:36:07 +1000."
<CALf9hzBCG1Hiq-_w41-CwS_c8nz=m0MMoQqyUz7X63tS2tpkNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:07:43 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1439255263_2182P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:36:07 +1000, Nick Pratley said:
> Once setup correctly. very good product - it's been running for 8 months
> now and hasn't had any issues. It's been very reliable.
I'll bite - (roughly) how many times has it triggered and mitigated an actual
DDoS during those 8 months? We probably draw different conclusions from "8
months and 1 DDoS" reliable and "8 months of 5-a-week" reliable...
--==_Exmh_1439255263_2182P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=N+pX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1439255263_2182P--
