[182881] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Rothschild)
Mon Aug 3 14:37:33 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabBW5dDMmBpXyv1K7A--+fCVGqnV1d1Vaq5as0O+5AiVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Rothschild <asr@latency.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:37:11 -0400
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
An additional advantage for Frontier customers, post acquisition:
http://ipadmin.frontier.com/bilateralpeering_policy.pdf
http://www.verizonenterprise.com/terms/peering/
$0.02,
-a
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Black <Matthew.Black@csulb.edu>
> wrote:
> > I ran a few Google searches and came across a trove of complaints
> against Frontier. Seems they are far worse than GTE/Verizon. On the few
> occasions I have called for FIOS support, always reached someone
> knowledgeable and helpful. Not looking forward to the changeover, as the
> new owners have to pay off debts from their acquisition. That can only be
> accomplished through rate increases. I see a Verizon tech outside my
> kitchen window every two to three days as he replaces two nitrogen tanks
> keeping copper trunks pressurized against water intrusion.
> >
>
> though, on the positive side... maybe you'll see ipv6 on frontier fios
> before the heat death of the universe? (*which is when vz fios folk
> will see it, apparently).
>
