[182573] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Thu Jul 23 00:03:27 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:01:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <0D2A44A8-72F3-45FD-8210-B2DDA5B47890@gt86car.org.uk>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
> blocking to mitigate risk is a better trade off gaining better
> percentage legit traffic against a indventant minor valid good network
> range.
There are bound to be an awful lot of babies in that bathwater you're
planning to throw out.
You're certainly free to block whatever traffic you wish, but your
customers might not appreciate a heavy-handed approach to stopping bad
traffic at the gates.
jms
