[182530] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mikea)
Mon Jul 20 17:01:30 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:56:57 -0500
From: mikea <mikea@mikea.ath.cx>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <0D2A44A8-72F3-45FD-8210-B2DDA5B47890@gt86car.org.uk>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:50:44PM +0100, Colin Johnston wrote:
> blocking to mitigate risk is a better trade off gaining better percentage
> legit traffic against a indventant minor valid good network range.
That may be your call, or your management's call, but that doesn't make it
*my* call or my management's call. Reasonable people can disagree about this.
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mikea@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
