[181148] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Luthman)
Wed Jun 17 17:22:06 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CADR+d4b4AZXGy4BvcemXsGrdMFmJ598XX27NZpj8hz7X871ykg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:13:59 -0400
To: luan.nguyen@dimensiondata.com
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Probably fine to NAT it yourself until it is allocated and someone starts
using it.
Why not just use RFC1918 space?
https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=1JEgabzMOJx1l25zHZK5wv4_Tn9KRsyDGgSq-M4g
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Luan Nguyen <lnguyen@opsource.net> wrote:
> Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it?
> Just for NATTING on Cisco gears...
>
