[181147] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Wicks)
Wed Jun 17 17:18:48 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Tony Wicks" <tony@wicks.co.nz>
To: <luan.nguyen@dimensiondata.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADR+d4b4AZXGy4BvcemXsGrdMFmJ598XX27NZpj8hz7X871ykg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:13:20 +1200
WTL-MailScanner-From: tony@wicks.co.nz
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Use 100.64.0.0/10, this is the CGNAT reserved range.I would most =
definitely not recommend 240.0.0.0
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Luan Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2015 9:07 a.m.
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4
Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it?
Just for NATTING on Cisco gears...
