[181056] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Sun Jun 14 22:41:35 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJB2g-Gio-1K39AQBK8Eki3=X0YN61WQuKn1vtP+L3e0AHPsRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 22:41:32 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Rafael Possamai <rafael@gav.ufsc.br>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Rafael Possamai <rafael@gav.ufsc.br> wrote:
> Well, I was wondering the same. I am guessing it depends on the SLA
> contract since they are all very unique and specific.
I'm going to bet that aside from a few one-off cases the SLA in
question talks about maintaining reachability inside L3's network, or
maybe even 'is your link up and can you ping the L3 gateway router you
connect to?'
SLA's aren't meant to actually get paid out...
