[181049] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (b-nanog@grmbl.net)
Sun Jun 14 20:26:39 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 02:26:25 +0200
From: B <b-nanog@grmbl.net>
To: ryanL <ryan.landry@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK_-TSbWCgOo_HO9BfLZTkhe9x-ygndcEmdCqV8uyUfeKo+Ayw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

In addition to that, losing face in SE Asia is "not done".

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:14:43AM +0000, ryanL wrote:
> keep in mind their target audience with that message is probably local
> malaysian customers, not the world.
> 
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org> wrote:
> 
> > SLAs are part of a contract, and thus only apply to the parties of the
> > contract. There are no payments due to other parties. The Internet is a
> > "best effort" network, with zero guarantees.
> >
> >  -mel beckman
> >
> > On Jun 14, 2015, at 4:06 PM, Rafael Possamai <rafael@gav.ufsc.br<mailto:
> > rafael@gav.ufsc.br>> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know if there's an official "ruling" as to who gets to pay for
> > the SLA breaches?
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org<mailto:
> > mel@beckman.org>> wrote:
> > Raymond,
> >
> > But you said "A simple 'sorry' would have done." Now you're asking for
> > lots more detail. Why the change?
> >
> >  -mel beckman

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post