[180685] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for information on IGP choices in dual-stack networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Tue Jun 9 19:04:15 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>,
Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:04:00 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaaH9YdzGHeO2yDMe8FXNBJ8ot8Bt-=8zfn9G-46p+uZDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--xWqjEDoUj44MXSFq8AIwrDNEeallNi7DD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 6/9/15 2:00 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9 Jun 2015, at 16:23, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>>>> If you have a production dual-stack network, then we would like to =
know
>>>>> which IGP you use to route IPv4 and which you use to route IPv6.
>>>>
>>>> in one network, both ospfs. in another is-is. i recommend the latt=
er.
>>>>
>>>>> We would also like to know roughly how many routers are running thi=
s
>>>>> combination.
>>>
>>> why is the question /routers/ and not /networks/ ?
>>
>> Routers makes more sense to me than networks (IGP, so one network, rig=
ht?)
>=20
> that confuses me, the logic I mean...
>=20
> I suppose in a single network I'd expect to see one igp for an address
> family (ospf or ospfv3). Not "eastcoast devices do ospf (stodgy
> bastards!) and westcoast goes isis!"
At one time I had datacenter interiors that had no isis support. they
ran ospfv2 and to the extent that it was necessary in limited
application ospfv3. the datacenter border and the backbone used ISIS for
both adress families. routes were in general not redistributed between IG=
Ps.
--xWqjEDoUj44MXSFq8AIwrDNEeallNi7DD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAlV3cOAACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrLbPgCfc9uo/bQpYYiaoyh9vjhC23vl
ZBMAnjoHiJYm8xu7Zv7UOSlkD7nvF4Ug
=divw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--xWqjEDoUj44MXSFq8AIwrDNEeallNi7DD--
