[180694] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for information on IGP choices in dual-stack networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Jun 9 21:50:49 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <m2fv60pdul.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 21:50:46 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> a researcher i know and respect asked a bunch of ops what features that
> used. the researcher finally said something similar to "operators seem
> to actually use all those kinky knobs and protocols."
>
> for any kink you can imagine, someone does it. there are operators who
> have even deployed ipv6 :)
see the other thread of the week, you are wrong sir! wrong! :)
At AS701/2/3 there were nominally 2k devices (way back when) using
ISIS for their igp for both v4 and v6 data... though the igp split on
as-boundaries.
hope that helps!
