[180682] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for information on IGP choices in dual-stack networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Jun 9 18:02:49 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Sameer Khosla <skhosla@neutraldata.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:55:31 -0000."
<49A81EB09F493442B6D259E36251192C01719F1F6A@ndcc-exch1.neutraldata.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 18:00:45 -0400
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1433887245_2152P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:55:31 -0000, Sameer Khosla said:
> Think of scenarios where you have mergers/acquisitions where different
> portions of the now amalgamated network were designed differently and there may
> be too much pain or require too much time to redesign rather than bolt together
> and redistribute.
But in that case, don't they usually say "The heck with it" and continue
using 2 separate ASN numbers?
--==_Exmh_1433887245_2152P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=RKUC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1433887245_2152P--
